http://aticles.moneycentral.msn.com/investing/dispatch/default.aspx?feat=1321588>1=3302
1 It was about the boss of the Bank Of America not taking any money bonus for the year 2009 he felt it wouldnt be right because the bank wasnt making enough and something was going on so he didnt want to be apart of the payroll dispute.
2 I choose it because it was an intereseting article that dealt with how someone whos the boss of a big company would rather settle for a little less then deal with a dispute that will only lead into a bad ending.
3 Yea I agree with the item i choose beacuse I liked how Ken Lewis handled the sitiution on how things would be settled with out lossing it all.
4 Yea it was in a way presented fairly and in another way it wasnt. The way that it was fair is that they told Ken Lewis that he will loose a certain amount of money because of a scem and i thought it was a little unfair because he cant get payed his bonuses until the year of 2009.
5 Yea i would consider using the site again to make any other research because it looked professional and looked as though the information was rock solid.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Reychal, The "something" that was going on is that under Ken Lewis Bank of America almost went bankrupt and needed millions of dollars in taxpayer money. Should some of that money go to make a rich man richer?
ReplyDeleteGrade: 10/10
P.S. Please let me know who you are. I couldn't tell from your picture!